Exploring the Role of Principal Behavior in Shaping Teacher Performance

Mohammad  Rifa’i; Moh. Rofik

doi:10.32478/jaf6rd43

Authors

Mohammad Rifa’i Universitas Nurul Jadid, Probolinggo - Indonesia
Moh. Rofik Universitas Nurul Jadid, Probolinggo - Indonesia

Keywords:

Principal behavior, teacher performance, effective communication

Abstract

This research aims to examine the role of the principal's behavior in shaping teacher performance at Nurul Jadid High School. The main focus of the research is to understand how principal behavior, such as effective communication, appreciation of teachers, and ongoing coaching, influences the quality of teacher work. This research uses quantitative methods with a survey approach. Data was collected through questionnaires distributed to teachers at Nurul Jadid High School, then analyzed using regression analysis to determine the relationship between principal behavior and teacher performance. The research results show that positive principal behavior, especially effective communication and giving appreciation, has a significant influence on improving teacher performance. Apart from that, structured coaching helps improve the quality of teaching. Participative leadership has also been proven to increase collaboration between teachers. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of school principals in creating a positive work environment to improve the quality of education. Recommendations are given to school principals to continue to build open communication, provide regular appreciation, and carry out ongoing coaching to support teacher professional development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Moh. Rofik, Universitas Nurul Jadid, Probolinggo

Education

References

Ahmed, M., & Malik, B. (2021). Analysis of Job Satisfaction and Performance of Private and Public Sectors’ Teachers of Balochistan: A Comparative Study. Pakistan Study Centre, 14(2), 1–12.

Ariyani, D., & Zuhaery, M. (2021). Principal’s Innovation and Entrepreneurial Leadership to Establish a Positive Learning Environment. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 63–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.63

Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1858119

Buyukgoze, H., Caliskan, O., & Gümüş, S. (2024). Linking distributed leadership with collective teacher innovativeness: The mediating roles of job satisfaction and professional collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(6), 1388–1409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221130879

Eliophotou Menon, M., & Lefteri, A. (2021). The link between transformational leadership and teacher self-efficacy. Education, 142(1), 42–52.

Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513–531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389

Ganon-Shilon, S., Finkelstein, I., Sela-Shayovitz, R., & Schechter, C. (2023). Inclusive leadership in times of COVID-19 crisis: The role of district and school leaders in fostering school sense-making processes within a national inclusion and integration reform. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 22(4), 992–1012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2022.2052907

Gilson, C. B., & Biggs, E. E. (2024). Perspectives of special education teachers and paraprofessionals on working together in general education settings. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(14), 3341–3356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2216206

Kilag, O. K. T., Uy, F. T., Calledo, M. F. S., Cerna, Y. T. Dela, Villanueva, K. M., & Angtud, N. A. A. (2023). Quality performance of teachers: work environment, work attitude, and principal supervision: qualitative investigation. Science and Education, 4(7), 415–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/baerj.04.01.01

Kılınç, A. Ç., Polatcan, M., Savaş, G., & Er, E. (2024). How transformational leadership influences teachers’ commitment and innovative practices: Understanding the moderating role of trust in principal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(2), 455–474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221082803

LaGree, D., Houston, B., Duffy, M., & Shin, H. (2023). The effect of respect: Respectful communication at work drives resiliency, engagement, and job satisfaction among early career employees. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(3), 844–864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211016529

Li, L., & Liu, Y. (2022). An integrated model of principal transformational leadership and teacher leadership that is related to teacher self-efficacy and student academic performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(4), 661–678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1806036

Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 430–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438

Maqbool, S., Zafeer, H. M. I., Maqbool, S., Zeng, P., Draissi, Z., & Javed, S. (2024). Stance of numerous leadership styles and their effect on teaching to sustain academic performance at the high school level. Heliyon, 10(16). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36438

Meyer, A., Richter, D., & Hartung-Beck, V. (2022). The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration: Investigating the mediating effect of teachers’ collective efficacy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(4), 593–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220945698

Pan, H.-L. W., & Chen, W.-Y. (2021). How principal leadership facilitates teacher learning through teacher leadership: Determining the critical path. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 454–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220913553

Parlar, H., Turkoglu, M. E., & Cansoy, R. (2024). Instructional leadership as a predictor of collaborative culture in schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(4), 715–738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1913235

Pizzolitto, E., Verna, I., & Venditti, M. (2023). Authoritarian leadership styles and performance: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, 73(2), 841–871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00263-y

Samimi, M., Cortes, A. F., Anderson, M. H., & Herrmann, P. (2022). What is strategic leadership? Developing a framework for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(3), 101353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101353

Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305

Tannehill, D., Demirhan, G., Čaplová, P., & Avsar, Z. (2021). Continuing professional development for physical education teachers in Europe. European Physical Education Review, 27(1), 150–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X20931531

Tonich, T. (2021). file:///C:/Users/LENOVO-ARCOMP/Downloads/scholar (51).ris. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(1), 47–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2129536

Wang, Q., Hou, H., & Li, Z. (2022). Participative leadership: a literature review and prospects for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 924357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924357

Zhang, F. (2022). [Retracted] Design and Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology‐Driven Education and Teaching System in Universities. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022(1), 8503239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8503239

Zhang, X., Admiraal, W., & Saab, N. (2021). Teachers’ motivation to participate in continuous professional development: relationship with factors at the personal and school level. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(5), 714–731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1942804