THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE ONE STOP INTEGRATED SERVICE MANAGEMENT (PTSP) IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AT THE MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS IN MALANG CITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32478/leadership.v7i1.4801
Abstract
This study examines the management transformation of the One-Stop Integrated Service (PTSP) at the Ministry of Religious Affairs in Malang City, which achieved a 92% Public Satisfaction Index (IKM) in 2023 from 78% in 2020, with service time reduced from 4.7 to 1.9 working days. Despite growing literature on PTSP efficiency, no study has comprehensively examined the full management transformation cycle within a religious institution while integrating Islamic values as its normative governance foundation. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected from key informants comprising structural officials, PTSP staff, service users, and public service experts through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, documentation, and focus group discussions, then analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldana interactive model. Four novel conceptual constructs emerged: the TRUST model (Transformational Religious-based Unified Service Trust), SMART model (Strategic Management Assessment Responsive Transformation), SERVE model (Service Excellence and Responsive Value Engagement), and ETHIC model (Ethical Transparency and Human-centered Institutional Governance), integrating into the overarching SDG–PTSP model (Spiritual Digital Governance for Public Service Transformation). A key theoretical contribution is the extension of Lewin’s (1947) organizational change model from three to four stages, adding Re-Freeforming as a phase of continuous spiritual-digital renewal unique to religious bureaucracies.
Keywords: PTSP transformation; public service quality; digital governance; Islamic values; SDG–PTSP; religious bureaucracy.
Abstrak
Studi ini meneliti transformasi manajemen Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Atap (PTSP) di Kementerian Agama Kota Malang, yang mencapai Indeks Kepuasan Masyarakat (IKM) sebesar 92% pada tahun 2023 dari 78% pada tahun 2020, dengan waktu pelayanan berkurang dari 4,7 menjadi 1,9 hari kerja. Meskipun literatur tentang efisiensi PTSP semakin berkembang, belum ada studi yang secara komprehensif meneliti siklus transformasi manajemen secara menyeluruh dalam sebuah lembaga keagamaan sambil mengintegrasikan nilai-nilai Islam sebagai landasan tata kelola normatifnya. Dengan menggunakan desain studi kasus kualitatif, data dikumpulkan dari informan kunci yang terdiri dari pejabat struktural, staf PTSP, pengguna layanan, dan pakar pelayanan publik melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi partisipatif, dokumentasi, dan diskusi kelompok fokus, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan model interaktif Miles, Huberman, dan Saldana. Empat konstruksi konseptual baru muncul: model TRUST (Transformational Religious-based Unified Service Trust), model SMART (Strategic Management Assessment Responsive Transformation), model SERVE (Service Excellence and Responsive Value Engagement), dan model ETHIC (Ethical Transparency and Human-centered Institutional Governance), yang terintegrasi ke dalam model SDG–PTSP (Spiritual Digital Governance for Public Service Transformation) yang lebih luas. Kontribusi teoritis utama adalah perluasan model perubahan organisasi Lewin (1947) dari tiga menjadi empat tahap, dengan menambahkan Re-Freeforming sebagai fase pembaruan spiritual-digital berkelanjutan yang unik untuk birokrasi keagamaan.
Kata kunci: transformasi PTSP; kualitas publik; digital governance; nilai Islami; birokrasi religius.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, R. (2020). Resistensi perubahan dan transformasi PTSP di Kementerian Agama. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8(2), 45–58.
Ahmad Yani, A., Marlina, E., & Ramdhan, M. (2024). Kebijakan pelayanan terpadu satu pintu (PTSP) dalam perspektif good governance. AL-QISTH Law Review, 7(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.24853/alqisth.7.2.215
Alhyasat, A. (2012). The role of Islamic work ethics in developing organizational citizenship behavior. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 10(4), 85–92.
Ali, A. J., & Al-Owaihan, A. (2008). Islamic work ethic: A critical review. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600810848791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600810848791
Al-Sabbagh, A., & Al-Jabr, N. (2022). Improving public services through digital transformation: A study of PTSP in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Global Public Administration, 8(3), 275–295.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.
Bian, X. (2025). The trust trifecta: How transparency, ethics, and benefits shape public confidence in government AI. Government Information Quarterly, 42(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.101918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102083
Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations (5th ed.). Wiley.
Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the Harwood studies: The foundations of OD. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(4), 977–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886304266240
Burnes, B. (2009). Reflections: Ethics and organizational change. Journal of Change Management, 9(4), 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010903360558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010903360558
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering (4th ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709765
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296194.001.0001
Gustiawan, D., & Azzahra, R. S. (2025). How Islamic work ethics affect thriving at work and employee commitment. Serambi, 12(1), 45–58.
Kemenag Jatim. (2022). Laporan evaluasi pelayanan terpadu satu pintu tahun 2022. Kanwil Kementerian Agama Provinsi Jawa Timur.
Kurniawati, D. (2019). Efektivitas implementasi PTSP di Kementerian Agama. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 2(1), 12–24.
Lestari, N., & Suryadi, A. (2021). Transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam PTSP. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 12(2), 88–101.
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Liu, B., & Wang, Y. (2020). The role of technology in public service transformation: A comparative study of PTSP in China and Indonesia. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(6), 514–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1672189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1672189
Maulana, M. (2023). Penggunaan teknologi informasi dalam PTSP. Jurnal Teknologi dan Pelayanan Publik, 5(1), 33–47.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Nguyen, T. Q., & Tran, V. H. (2023). Evaluating the impact of PTSP transformation on public satisfaction in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Public Administration, 5(1), 89–103.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/976618
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
PTSP Digital Report. (2023). Laporan kinerja digital PTSP Kementerian Agama Kota Malang. Kantor Kementerian Agama Kota Malang.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability. Open University Press.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
Sutiah & Supriyono. (2024). Enhancing online learning quality: A structural equation modeling analysis of educational technology implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 16, 100175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100175
UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme.
Virnandes, S. R., Kusumasari, B., & Pramusinto, A. (2024). Building public trust through digital government transformation. Procedia Computer Science, 234, 1122–1131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.114
Wahyuni, S. (2022). Aksesibilitas layanan publik melalui PTSP. Jurnal Pelayanan Publik, 9(1), 55–68.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Yousef, D. A. (2000). Islamic work ethic as a moderator of the relationship between locus of control, role conflict and role ambiguity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(4), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940010330966 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940010330966
Zafar, M. B., Suleman, M., Nawaz, K., & Ahmad, M. N. (2025). Mapping the landscape of Islamic work ethic: Topic modeling and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 16(2), 312–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-2024-0134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2024-0144
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zainal Anwar, Umi Sumbulah, M. Fahim Tharaba, Sutiah Sutiah, Obaidul Hoque

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





