SELF-REGULATED LEARNING (SRL) PADA MAHASISWA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN DIGITAL: SINTESIS STRATEGI, FAKTOR PSIKOLOGIS, DAN TANTANGAN BELAJAR: Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) among College Students in Digital Learning: A Synthesis of Strategies, Psychological Factors, and Learning Challenges

Achmad Kholif Rosyidi; Riskia Putra; Denny Prabu Syahputra

doi:10.32478/ta3xyp61

Authors

Achmad Kholif Rosyidi
[email protected]
Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember - Indonesia
Riskia Putra Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember - Indonesia
Denny Prabu Syahputra Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember - Indonesia

Keywords:

Mahasiswa , Pembelajaran Digital , Psikologi Pendidikan , Regulasi Diri , Self-Regulated Learning

Abstract

Digital learning provides university students with greater flexibility and autonomy, but also increases the demands of regulating learning independently. This study analyzes and synthesizes literature on Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) among university students in digital learning, focusing on SRL strategies, psychological factors, and challenges in digital environments. A qualitative approach was employed through a qualitative literature review using purposive literature selection and qualitative content analysis. The literature included empirical studies and reviews of online learning, blended learning, distance education, learning management systems, and technology-mediated learning. The synthesis shows that planning, time management, monitoring, effort regulation, and reflection recur across studies, although their contributions to learning outcomes are not uniform. Self-efficacy, motivation, metacognition, and emotion regulation function as resources, while LMS design, feedback, digital literacy, institutional support, and technological characteristics shape regulatory challenges. Digital autonomy can serve as a resource or an additional regulatory demand depending on student capacity and environmental support.

Pembelajaran digital memberikan fleksibilitas dan otonomi yang lebih besar kepada mahasiswa, tetapi juga meningkatkan tuntutan untuk mengatur proses belajar secara mandiri. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dan mensintesis literatur tentang Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) pada mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran digital dengan fokus pada strategi SRL, faktor psikologis, dan tantangan lingkungan digital. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui qualitative literature review dengan pemilihan literatur secara purposif dan qualitative content analysis. Literatur mencakup penelitian empiris dan kajian ilmiah mengenai pembelajaran daring, blended learning, pendidikan jarak jauh, learning management system, dan pembelajaran berbasis teknologi. Hasil sintesis menunjukkan bahwa perencanaan, manajemen waktu, monitoring, regulasi usaha, dan refleksi merupakan strategi yang berulang, tetapi kontribusinya terhadap hasil belajar tidak seragam. Self-efficacy, motivasi, metakognisi, dan regulasi emosi menjadi sumber daya penting, sedangkan desain LMS, feedback, literasi digital, dukungan institusional, dan karakteristik teknologi membentuk tantangan regulasi. Otonomi digital dapat menjadi sumber daya atau tuntutan tambahan bergantung pada kapasitas mahasiswa dan dukungan lingkungan.

Kata Kunci: Mahasiswa; Pembelajaran Digital; Psikologi Pendidikan; Regulasi Diri; Self-Regulated Learning

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Achmad Kholif Rosyidi, Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Dosen/Peneliti di Program Studi Psikologi Islam, Fakultas Dakwah, Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember.
Riskia Putra, Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
Denny Prabu Syahputra, Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

References

Arrafii, M., Sumarsono, D., & Suadiyatno, T. (2025). Self-regulated learning strategies in distance education: Insights from Indonesia. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(4), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202534897

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.

Begum, N. F., & Venkatesan, D. (2026). Self-regulated learning behaviours and employability skills in online learning environments: The mediating role of self-evaluation. Frontiers in Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1832369

Biwer, F., Wiradhany, W., Oude Egbrink, M., Hospers, H., Wasenitz, S., Jansen, W., & de Bruin, A. (2021). Changes and adaptations: How university students self-regulate their online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 642593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642593

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007

Çakiroğlu, Ü., Kokoç, M., & Atabay, M. (2024). Online learners’ self-regulated learning skills regarding LMS interactions: A profiling study. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36, 220–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-024-09397-2

Chen, F. (2025). The relationship between digital literacy and college students’ academic achievement: The chain mediating role of learning adaptation and online self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1590649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1590649

Chen, J. (2024). Effects of learning analytics-based feedback on students’ self-regulated learning and academic achievement in a blended EFL course. System, 124, 103388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103388

Eggers, J. H., Oostdam, R., Voogt, J., & Zijlstra Bonne, J. H. (2025). Retention effects of instruction in self-regulation strategies in blended learning environments. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 87, 101527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101527

Estika Satriani, U., M., Z., Ermanto, E., Chandima Kumara, W., & Fauzul, E. (2024). A design of learning activities that created students’ self-regulated learning through LMS Moodle. International Journal of Language Pedagogy, 4(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijolp.v4i2.79

Han, F., Vaculíková, J., & Juklová, K. (2022). The relations between Czech undergraduates’ motivation and emotion in self-regulated learning, learning engagement, and academic success in blended course designs: Consistency between theory-driven and data-driven approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1001202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001202

Huang, K., & Lee-Post, A. (2025). Enhancing online college students’ self-regulated learning and performance through self-assessments and commitment strategies. Internet and Higher Education, 67, 101033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101033

Juárez López, M. B., Gil Quevedo, W. S., García Chapoñan, A. W., & Laos Fernández, E. L. (2026). Self-regulated learning and academic success under digital inequality among Peruvian university students: The moderating role of institutional support. Frontiers in Psychology, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1838281

Lan, M., Liu, H., & Pan, Q. (2025). Unpacking the digital literacy–self-regulated learning nexus: A systematic review and a three-level meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 47, 100713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100713

Lobos, K., Cobo-Rendón, R., Bruna Jofré, D., & Santana, J. (2024). New challenges for higher education: Self-regulated learning in blended learning contexts. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1457367. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1457367

Mahmud, Y. S., & German, E. (2021). Online self-regulated learning strategies amid a global pandemic: Insights from Indonesian university students. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.2

Mutiah, D., Paulina, M., & Putra, M. D. K. (2023). Psychosocial factors affecting self-regulated learning among Indonesian Islamic college students: The mediating role of perception feedback. Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.25217/0020236369200

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189–1208.

Satianugraha, H. (2024). Self-regulated learning profiles of students in online learning. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v7i2.10963

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. SAGE Publications.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Theobald, M. (2021). Self-regulated learning training programs enhance university students’ academic performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101976

Theobald, M., & Bellhäuser, H. (2022). How am I going and where to next? Elaborated online feedback improves university students’ self-regulated learning and performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100872

Ulfatun, T., Septiyanti, F., & Lesmana, A. G. (2021). University students’ online learning self-efficacy and self-regulated learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(12), 597–602. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.12.1570

Usman, E. S., Zaim, M., Ermanto, Walpita, C. K., & Etfita, F. (2024). A design of learning activities that created students’ self-regulated learning through LMS Moodle. International Journal of Language Pedagogy, 4(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijolp.v4i2.79

Vos, S. G., Wijnia, L., Martens, R. L., & de Groot, R. H. M. (2025). How do distance learners self-regulate learning? A latent profile analysis of self-regulated learning and its relationship with self-regulatory efficacy, motivation, need satisfaction, need frustration, academic achievement, and well-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102678

Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4–5), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084

Xia, Q., Aldharman, N. S., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2026). How do autonomy, critical thinking, and artificial intelligence value perception affect university student self-regulated learning? TechTrends, 70, 902–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-026-01203-3

Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Ma, S., Xu, Z., & Zhang, B. (2025). A meta-analysis of the correlation between self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 230, 105279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105279

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.